Back to contributors

Author

Dr. Meng Zhao

Editorial Lead, NIH Grant Explorer

About

Meng Zhao oversees long-form editorial coverage on NIH grant strategy, study section behavior, and mechanism selection at NIH Grant Explorer. Her work focuses on translating raw NIH RePORTER data and publicly available federal records into practical guidance for first-time R01 applicants, postdocs preparing K-series transitions, and trainees navigating F-series fellowships.

Areas of focus

  • NIH grant application strategy
  • Specific Aims and Research Strategy review
  • K99/R00 and F-series fellowship guidance
  • NIH study section interpretation
  • Funding-trend analysis and institute fit

Recent guides

Grant Application Guide12 min read

NIH Subcontracts and Consortium Agreements: What to Know Before You Add an Outside Collaborator

What to know before you add a collaborator at another institution to an NIH grant. Covers consortium vs. subcontract terminology, statement of work writing, F&A rates, reviewer expectations, and common errors that delay award setup.

Sep 4, 2026Read
Grant Writing Tips12 min read

NIH Research Timeline and Milestones: What Reviewers Actually Check

How to write an NIH research timeline and milestones section that holds up under reviewer scrutiny. Covers R01 and K award timelines, contingency planning, common mistakes, and what reviewers are really looking for in your Approach section.

Sep 3, 2026Read
Funding Strategy15 min read

NIH P01 Program Project Grant: Strategy for a Winning Multi-Project Application

A researcher-level guide to deciding when to pursue a P01, how to build genuine synergy across projects, use scientific cores effectively, navigate the 15-week pre-submission requirement, and survive multi-project peer review.

Sep 2, 2026Read
Grant Writing Tips13 min read

Writing the NIH Mentorship Plan for K Awards: What Reviewers Look For

The Mentorship Plan is the section of a K award application that most applicants underwrite. A practical guide to choosing mentors, structuring the mentoring committee, and writing the plan so reviewers see a real training program, not a formality.

Sep 1, 2026Read
Grant Writing Tips12 min read

Writing NIH Grants for Non-Specialist Reviewers: How to Win Votes Beyond Your Assigned Panel

Your 3 assigned reviewers are experts. The other 20 panelists may not be. How to write NIH grants that work for both audiences, avoid jargon traps, and earn scores that hold up through the full panel discussion.

Aug 31, 2026Read
Grant Writing Tips11 min read

NIH Salary Cap Explained: How to Budget Personnel Costs Without Shortchanging Your Grant

The NIH salary cap limits what federal grants can pay per individual. How to calculate effort correctly, handle cap changes mid-award, avoid common budgeting mistakes, and protect your project when a key PI or collaborator earns above the cap.

Aug 30, 2026Read
Funding Strategy10 min read

NIH Grant Strategy for Computational and AI Research

How to frame AI and machine learning projects for NIH reviewers, choose the right institute and study section, write aims that don't read as sequential pipelines, and satisfy rigor requirements when your lab doesn't do bench work.

Aug 29, 2026Read
Grant Writing Tips11 min read

NIH Is Proposing Categorical Grant Scores: What NOT-OD-26-088 Means for Your Writing Strategy

NIH released NOT-OD-26-088 in August 2026, proposing to replace numerical impact scores with three categories — Most competitive, Competitive, and Not discussed. A practical guide for grant writers on what changes, what doesn't, and how to adapt before the proposal is finalized.

Aug 28, 2026Read